Receipt coverage answers a practical question: which purchases have supporting evidence, and which still need attention?
A useful report states the period, the transaction sources, and the evidence sources reviewed. Without that scope, “complete” can mean less than it appears.
How to review coverage with Terrapin
- Define the period and accounts you are reviewing.
- Search the supported sources you connect.
- Review available receipt matches against transaction information.
- Separate supported purchases from uncertain matches and unresolved gaps.
Terrapin searches connected sources, matches available evidence, and shows what is still missing. The 7-day free trial includes 90-day discovery.
What a useful coverage summary should include
- The review period and accounts included.
- The connected evidence sources checked.
- Purchases with reviewed supporting evidence.
- Matches that still need a decision.
- Transactions without matched evidence and the next follow-up action.
Keep the original documents available. A summary is a guide to the evidence, not a replacement for it.
What coverage does not prove
Coverage is limited by the information reviewed. It does not prove that every purchase was included, every receipt was found, or every expense meets tax or company-policy requirements.
Banks supply transaction information, not receipts.
FAQ
Is this a promise of a dedicated report format?
No. This guide explains how to assess receipt coverage using available evidence and review results. Confirm any specific reporting or export requirement before relying on it.
Can I call the records complete?
State the scope and unresolved exceptions. Avoid claiming completeness beyond the sources and period you actually checked.
What should happen to unresolved gaps?
Assign a next action: check another source, request a merchant copy, or ask the accountant how to handle the missing evidence.